Find the gaps before the panel does.
AI-powered verification for complex regulatory applications. Completeness checking, fact checking, external validation, and precedent matching. Across thousands of pages.
Applications fail for preventable reasons.
Critical gaps get missed in large regulatory submissions. A single overlooked requirement, an inconsistent claim, or a missing cross-reference can derail an application worth millions, even after years of preparation.
The documents are too large for manual review.
Thousands of pages across hundreds of technical reports, legal opinions, and environmental assessments. No individual or team can hold the full picture in their head and verify every claim against every requirement.
General AI tools aren't built for this.
ChatGPT and generic AI tools lack the domain-specific knowledge to verify regulatory applications. They don't know the legislation, the precedents, or the specific requirements that panels use to evaluate submissions.
What TruthMatrix Does
Completeness Checking
Verifies your application addresses every statutory requirement. Flags what's missing before and during your application.
Fact Checking
Cross-references claims within your application for internal consistency. Catches contradictions between documents.
External Validation
Checks your assumptions against publicly available council, agency, and infrastructure data.
Precedent Matching
Compares your application against patterns from prior panel decisions that caused problems.
Q&A and Response Drafting
Answers questions about your application instantly. Drafts responses to panel queries.
Right now, we're focused on NZ's Fast-Track Approvals process, where the stakes are highest.
See how TruthMatrix verifies fast-track approval applicationsRead our complete guide to NZ fast-track approvalsThe FTA Numbers
3
projects that hit serious problems in the first year
4
words missing from a Schedule 2 description that halted an entire application
7
requirements Te Kuha failed to meet
10+
years old: the age of data found in a live FTA application
When to Use TruthMatrix
About to lodge
Catch completeness gaps, infrastructure misalignment, and scope issues before the review clock starts.
Responding to the panel
Draft responses that are consistent with every claim across your full application.
Facing opposition
Find the weaknesses before opponents do. Know exactly where your application is exposed.
Mid-process review
New issues have surfaced. Verify your position still holds against every statutory requirement.
Who is TruthMatrix For
Applicants
Verify completeness before and during the process. Run your full application package against statutory requirements. TruthMatrix flags gaps in addressing, missing cross-references between technical reports, and claims that lack supporting evidence.
Maintain consistency across hundreds of documents. When your application spans transport assessments, ecological reports, and economic analyses written by different authors, TruthMatrix cross-references every factual claim to catch contradictions between documents.
Prepare for scrutiny with confidence. Generate a structured verification report that shows exactly where your application is strong and where it needs work.
Consultancies
Quality-check the full application package your team has assembled. When you're coordinating inputs from subconsultants across planning, engineering, ecology, and transport, TruthMatrix verifies the integrated application holds together.
Respond to information requests faster. When a panel raises questions about specific claims, TruthMatrix locates the relevant evidence instantly and drafts responses consistent with everything else in the submission.
Deliver a higher standard of work to your clients. Provide a verification report alongside the application, demonstrating the rigour of your preparation. Use it as a repeatable quality process across every application your firm manages.
Legal Teams
Assess application quality and exposure quickly. Get a structured analysis of where a submission is well-supported and where it is vulnerable, without reading every technical report in full.
Identify inconsistencies that create risk. Find the contradictions between documents, unsupported assertions, and gaps in statutory coverage that opponents or panels are likely to exploit.
Build stronger arguments from the evidence base. Whether supporting an application or preparing opposition, interrogate the full document set and construct arguments grounded in what the application actually says.
Let's talk about your application.
We're currently taking a limited number of clients. If you're preparing a fast-track application, get in touch early.
Get in Touch